WebThe issue this case presented for the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's review was whether the deputy could lawfully conduct the traffic stop based on the expired registration … WebFirst, Appellant argues that her traffic stop was illegal. Appellant asserts that her traffic stop was an investigatory detention, as opposed to a mere encounter, because Officer Kopas …
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE …
WebFeb 21, 2008 · Based on this information, the officer decided to initiate a traffic stop. ¶ 6 Pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 6308(b), a police officer may stop a vehicle anytime the officer possesses reasonable suspicion of a motor vehicle violation. WebNov 26, 2008 · The former version of 75 Pa.C.S. § 6308 (b) required an officer to have “articulable and reasonable grounds to suspect a violation of [the Vehicle Code]” to effectuate a vehicle stop. 75 Pa.C.S. § 6308, amended by 2003 Pa. Laws 24, § … hochcd2 upmc.edu
FOURTH AMENDMENT: PASSENGERS AND POLICE …
WebHeien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54 (2014), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that a police officer's reasonable mistake of law can provide the individualized suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution to justify a traffic stop. The Court delivered its ruling on December 15, 2014. WebThe concepts of reasonable suspicion and probable cause are critical to any criminal defense especially in motor vehicle cases. A motor vehicle (car) stop is considered a “seizure” under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. WebUnder the Caballes case, a dog search is legal if it is conducted DURING a lawful traffic stop, and within the reasonable duration of the traffic stop. In the case, a state trooper stopped Caballes on a highway for speeding. While the trooper reported the stop to dispatch, a canine officer heard the transmission and arrived at the location. hochburghalle sexau